I hope that people understood the sarcasm of my previous writing, as I was venting my frustration about the election result. Even before the vote, I thought that manipulating the voting result would be as rude as the media play before the election. The end result would depend on what kind of voting result the manipulators would dare to present as a result of “democratic” elections. I would not have believed that all candidates, who clearly represent common sense were not elected. The basic Finns, who were previously pushed into offside position, succeeded in this election because of their NATO-friendly opinions and Russian opposition.
However, we must face the coming four years with this assembly and we must also admit that the election result was not only bad, even if the methods of creative accounting were used in the calculation.
The Truth Cast Adrift
When I have read advertisements of the country’s largest daily newspaper about “moving to a post-truth Era” I have been pondering what might this directly suggest. Generally speaking, the saying refers to circumstances, where objective facts affect public opinion less than relying on emotions and personal convictions. In practice, it has a confluence with the new guidelines for journalists that came into force in the beginning of 2005. The guidelines changed in a more tolerant direction, meaning that the instructions left more consideration to individual journalists on how to write.
According to the old guidelines, “the basis of a good journalistic practice is the right of the citizen to have access to true and generally important information that enables them to form a picture about their environment that is as truthful as possible”. In the new guidelines the requirement of correctness and relevance of information as well as truthfulness is omitted. Today ‘a good journalistic practice is based on everyone’s right to receive information and opinions’. It is mentioned that “the duty of a journalist is to seek truthful communication”. It remains to be guessed what it means for individual reporters, whose truth changes according to current trends.
On Friday, 3rd May 2019 was the International Day of Press Freedom, like every year. At the same time, it is also a day of freedom of speech. Erja Yläjärvi, editor-in-chief of Iltalehti-newspaper, published an editorial on the subject. She headed her article as follows: The Biggest Threat to Freedom of Speech in Finland Right Now: Other Finns
In her article, she expresses her concern about the amount of the filthy feedback that journalists have to receive every day. In her opinion, the danger of communication is that journalists do not want to expose themselves to that and start to look out for their words. Likewise, it can make it more difficult for journalists to find an interviewee on a controversial subject.
As I read the feedback for that article, a thought crosses my mind that the filthy feedback is targeted towards agenda-driven journalism, where journalists spread official truths and ignore everything that do not fit their agenda. Has it happened that, while the new guidelines for journalists say that “a good journalistic practice is based on everybody’s right to receive information and opinions”, media houses and journalists imagine that people have the right to hear journalists’ opinions? However, people expect journalists to spread pure knowledge like in earlier days so that they can form themselves as objective and truthful an opinion as possible. In the light of these thoughts, the message of Erja Yläjärvi’s article was simply that the greatest threat to freedom of expression is that journalists are not allowed to express their opinions freely.
So we are literally living post-truth times, when people do not even want to admit that there is any absolute truth. Except your own life and your own rights and interests, of course. People who have grown up in free democracies have become (speed) blind and live in an illusion that free democracy is a social order that stays upright without needing to be controlled. How many really realizes that the preservation of freedom requires us to acknowledge the absolute fact that everyone has been born into this world as a free individual, which requires taking care of the welfare and freedom of others?
All guidelines and rules of a free democracy can be derived from the freedoms of citizens and their respective responsibilities. In addition to freedom, they seek to ensure equal treatment of people, taking into account their starting points. Understanding the big picture of democracy and meaningful action requires common sense, which keeps the structures stick together. When the truth is kissed off and common sense disappears, there are very contradictory opinions and goals without justification as consequence:
There are no genders, and girls should not be called as girls and boys as boys, but the exchange of gender is a human right. Gender and citizen equality are the Alfa and Omega of everything, but equality does not matter when it comes to “positive discrimination”. In this election, the Green party brought 17 women and three men into the parliament. Women’s rights are promoted, as well as the emergence of female-hostile cultures, even by stigmatizing critics of female hostility as “hate speech”. All cultures are equal. It does not matter whether the cultures form organized societies or whether they are formed by tribes and clans fighting against each other, whether people live in peaceful coexistence or whether they chop off the heads of infidels.
There is a desire for democracy, tolerance, freedom of opinion and equality, but thoughtcriminals like people with false beliefs, are eliminated or sent to prison. Every “virtueradiant” emphasizes his/her tolerance, especially after rejecting people with false opinions without further parley. For the last ten years, the public debate has focused on, with whom it is not appropriate to cooperate. This exclusion of people with “false” opinions is “better” (mental) violence that is demonstrated by showing the middle finger on the image I attached to this article. Do my eyes see right that in the middle of the crowd is our former president Tarja Halonen?
Democratic Activity Astray
In the past, the contradictions were settled in a democratic process, as different world views were able to compete equally for support, that is, for usability. Things were driven by common sense, and people tried to find the most meaningful solutions to problems in regard of the functioning of society. Now everyone is trumpeting their opinions and subjective notions, because “I have the right”. In the name of tolerance, everyone should accept these concepts regardless how damaging they are to the functioning of society.
Before the election, a number of Green Leftist candidates held an open political event at Kaisa-house, which they called “Would you have a moment to discuss about hate speech”. They reported on Facebook about the event. Ilja Janitskin, who is known of his clear opinions and outspoken style, thanked the invitation and expressed his willingness to participate in the event. After a moment, he was notified by an organizer of the event that he was not invited.
Panu Huuhtanen, a candidate of the Reform Party took part in the event and filmed it without speaking out on the actual debate. The organizers of the event (MP candidates) were extremely disturbed by that. Using common sense one would have thought that the candidates would have been pleased of any kind of publicity that their event gets, and that they have the opportunity to express their views to larger public.
I watched the video from the beginning a small clip and I felt, as if the organizers were in mass psychosis. They blamed Panu Huuhtanen and other “hate speakers” (persons, who question their opinions) for bullying, who always come to film their events and even take close-ups of the activists. Eventually, Panu Huuhtanen was removed from the event by police officers.
I thought it would be better for the candidates, who organized the event to leave politics to people, who tolerate criticism and are able to justify their viewpoints. And, apparently, even though communications professionals have removed the requirement of truth from the journalists’ guidelines, or have given journalists the freedom to determine the truth according to prevailing trends, people who use common sense still rely on age-old truths that make up our moral backbone. None of the organizers of the event were elected.
It is incomprehensible that Finland, a country that emphasizes openness and democracy, has allowed to set up an institution such as the European Center of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, which is completely beyond control of Finnish authorities. Followed by the establishment of the Hybrid Center, the Finnish Mediaunion (Mediapooli) was set up, which includes all mainstream media units, which are now committed to turn down all NATO and EU critical statements. Therefore, for example, Paavo Väyrynen, our most experienced politician and candidate and NATO and EU critic did not get any media coverage at all during the parliamentary elections. Immediately after the election, the Finnish MTV interviewed him.
Common Sense Gone Lost
Due to my inability to speak and my physical disability, I had difficulty getting into any kind of education in the early 1980s. However, I had a compelling need to learn new things. So I attended paid courses in summer university. The first course I attended was a course in philosophy of science. Many thought it was a joke, because the course was certainly not designed for an ignorant, uneducated and inexperienced person like me, who could not speak and had a severe physical disability.
Nevertheless, the course led me to the basic rules of logical thinking and conclusions. For example, if statements a and b are true, then the resulting conclusion c is also true. For example, it is known that humans and animals inhale oxygen and that it becomes carbon dioxide (CO2) in the body’s processes, which is then blown out when we exhale. This carbon dioxide produced by the body is a gas that plants bind to themselves in photosynthesis, producing sugars and oxygen. Animals and people live on the oxygen and food the plants produce. Conclusion: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a vital gas for life.
We also know that in the history of mankind, no dictator who has oppressed his/her people has been able to mobilize citizens in a way that they have created welfare. After the First World War, the National Socialist Germany became the world’s leading industrial country in a few years under the guidance of Adolf Hitler. Conclusion: Adolf Hitler was not a dictator, who subjugated his people.
In my articles I have laid stress on the importance of common sense in our lives. In my mind, common sense is besides intuitive knowing also logical thinking that takes into account the rules of logic. Each claim is either true or false. The conclusion is true when it corresponds to external reality. We should draw truthful conclusions. This is also related to the sense of justice.
I would like to see the actions of all, especially our decision makers, guided by common sense. Some people think that common sense is a myth. It is certainly a myth for those who have no experience about it. They think that common sense is general knowledge in a society, non-verbal agreements, and generally accepted practices that have become stabled over time through the influence of individual egos. And because new egos are constantly evolving, who want to influence things and change practices, old common sense practices are overridden.
I have thought that the greatest merit of academic education is that people, who go through university education have more likely than those with lower education the capacity to multifaceted analytical thinking. However, this is no longer the case when universities and their policies and research are led by various kind of stories, which are rather determined by the feelings and personal convictions of researchers than objective facts.
People, who do not understand the simplest rules of logic, that means, who are not capable of independent, rational thinking are graduated from universities. They have herd mentality and go like sheeple after good stories. This is just as bad as the fact that some schoolchildren are illiterate at the end of elementary school, in other words are not able to raise over time and space.
Post-truth Era Is Bluff
Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli historian and professor of history at the University of Jerusalem, is pondering, what is the crucial difference between humans and animals. What has had the greatest effect on the fact that man has become the lord of creation? When I listen to Mr Harari’s TED talk, I cannot ignore his background and the fact that he is a product of his own society, like the rest of us.
The first thing that draws my attention is his purely materialistic approach to things. He says that human superiority to animals is the imagination of people. This corresponds more or less to what I have learned that the most significant quality of humans is his ability to abstract thinking.
However, I cannot digest Mr Harari’s idea that the basis for people’s success is their ability to invent fictional stories that other people will adopt, which allow people cooperate extensively. I myself think that people have succeeded despite the fact that some people have invented fictional stories. There have always been enough people, who have been able to distinguish fact from fiction and promote sustainable development of things.
This has certainly required self-control and also, to some extent, living according to fictional stories without really accepting them. Criminal investigators do not disclose their cards until they are sure that they have enough evidence to convict criminals.
Noah Harari says that people have always wanted to believe in good stories rather than purely truth. In order to stay in power, the power elite must sooner or later resort to modified truth. This was what happened in the early stages of Christianity, when, according to Harari, Christians “closed themselves to a mythological bubble where no one dared question the truthfulness of the Bible”.
The legacy of Jesus was revolutionary, because he taught that every human being has a direct connection with God when he or she obeys the Spirit of God in his heart and does the will of God. In order to preserve its power, the elite had to invent a different story that held the masses under their control.
According to that story, Jesus spoke about life after death and the reward of life-long righteousness comes only after death when people live according to the rules of clergymen in touch with the Church. Jesus’ simple teaching of the Kingdom of Heaven in the hearts of men was since then ruled by religion and church.
Despite the fact that people have been deceived for centuries, we can be confident, because the truth does not burn. Despite of massive deception attempts, structures based on modified truth will sooner or later fail.
Erja Yläjärvi: Suomalaisten sananvapauden suurin uhka juuri nyt: Toiset suomalaiset (The Biggest Threat to Freedom of Speech in Finland Right Now: Other Finns)
Videos:Noah Harari (TED talk): Why humans run the world Lee Camp: You Are Being Lied To About Julian Assange
The biggest security threat of the state, hate speech has been tackled.
When the discord in our plural multicultural state is silenced, we can look at a tolerant, homogeneous, openly guided society.
According to news, more female energy (Yin, Jinn) than ever before came to the Parliament . Maybe we can see in the future more MPs, who carry pins with the words “Pussy smells good”, in style of Rosa Meriläinen, our former representative. Our NATO-masters would like that.
All is well in the vassal state.
Pari päivää sitten näin Youtube-videon, joka sai niskavillani nousemaan pystyyn. Nuori nainen Ylen viihdeohjelmassa viime syksynä haastatteli Paavo Väyrystä yhtä ylimieliseen sävyyn kuin valtamedia ylipäätään suhtautuu Paavoon. Mieleeni tuli Kiinan kulttuurivallankumous, jossa intellektuellit saivat tötterölakin päähänsä, jonka jälkeen he olivat avoimesti kansan pilkattavana. Paavo ei kuitenkaan tilanteessa provosoitunut, vaan esitteli asiallisesti omat motiivinsa ja tavoitteensa.
Jos eläisimme demokratiassa, jokaisen puolueen puheenjohtaja kilpailisi tilaisuudesta päästä keskustelemaan maan kokeneimman poliitikon (valtiomiehen) kanssa. Kuitenkin Paavo Väyrynen on suljettu pois yhtä poikkeusta lukuun ottamatta kaikista tärkeistä vaalikeskusteluista. Tämä kertoo omaa kieltään Suomen demokratian tilasta.
Viime vuosina keskustelupalstoilla on ollut katkeria vuodatuksia siitä, miten vanhemmat sukupolvet ovat pilanneet nuorten tulevaisuuden niin, ettei nykynuorille ole tulevaisuudessa varaa maksaa edes kunnon eläkkeitä. Jokainen luo oman todellisuutensa ja vetovoiman laki toimii tässäkin. Toisin kuin aikaisemmilla sukupolvilla, nykynuorilla on hyppysissään kaikki tieto, mikä auttaa heitä tekemään päätöksiä tosiasioihin pohjautuen.
Nykyisessä näennäisdemokratiassa epämääräisten agendojen edistäminen on tärkeämpää kuin kansan hyvinvointi ja sananvapaus. Koko valtiojohto puolustusvoimia myöten on saatu varjonyrkkeilemään kuvitteellisia Venäjän trolleja vastaan, vaikka valtamediassa on ilmiselvästi käynnissä läntisen propagandakoneiston hybridisota. On silkkaa tietämättömyyttä ja tyhmyyttä, jos nuoret jatkavat vanhempiensa tekemiä virheitä ja kiusaamisen kulttuuria ja valitsevat päättäviin asemiin samat tunarit, kuin tähänkin asti. Kuinka moni on ajatellut, että ehkä yhteiskuntamme tila on seurausta siitä, ettei Paavo Väyrysellä ole vuoden 1987 jälkeen, jolloin talousliberaalit pääsivät valtaan, ollut kykyjänsä vastaavaa asemaa hallituksessa.
Valta asettaa ihmiset alttiiksi turmelukselle.
Sanotaan, että valta turmelee ja ehdoton valta turmelee ehdottomasti. Valta itsessään ei turmele ketään. Siitä on osoituksena Paavo Väyrynen, joka on ollut erilaisissa luottamustehtävissä lähes 50 vuotta, mutta joka on yhtä uskollinen kansan palvelija kuin aloittaessaan poliitikkona 23-vuotiaana. Jos hän olisi korruptoitunut ja helposti manipuloitavissa hän olisi todennäköisesti paljon suositumpi poliittisissa piireissä.
Olin 1990-luvulla lyhyen aikaa töissä Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön Valtakunnallisessa vammaisneuvostossa, samassa yksikössä kuin Kalle Könkkölä. Hän piti hyvänä sitä, että vammaisilla oli edustus valtion virkakoneistossa, mutta hänen mukaansa sillä oli myös huonot puolensa. En silloin osannut oikein kuvitella asian huonoja puolia, vaikka hän kantaansa vähän valaisikin. Vuosien saatossa olen ymmärtänyt, että asian varjopuoli on se, että virkamiehet ovat sidoksissa kulloiseenkin poliittiseen agendaan, vaikka henkilökohtaisesti olisivat asioista eri mieltä. Siten virkamiehet ja vallanpitäjät tavallaan myyvät sielunsa toisten tavoitteiden edistämiseen.
Viime viikolla näin mainoksen Armanin uudesta rahankäyttöä käsittelevästä televisiosarjasta. Mainoksessa nuori nainen sanoo, että valitettava tosiasia on, että raha pyörittää maailmaa. Tämä ei onneksi ole mikään tosiasia. Ihmiset, jotka näin ajattelevat antavat oman valtansa rahalle, mikä on materialismin selkein ilmentymä. Ihminen ei tarvitse latin latia sisäisen navigaattorinsa aktivoimiseen, jolloin hän pääsee kosketuksiin universumin luomisvoimien kanssa. Se vaatii vain vilpitöntä mieltä, rohkeutta ja ennen kaikkea luottamusta omaan arvostelukykyyn.
Videot:Yleperjantai 12.10.2018: Paavo Väyrynen Paavo Väyrynen: Seitsemän tähden liike
Paavo Väyrysen kysymys- ja vastaustunti
On Friday, March 15, 2019, schoolchildren all around the world protested over climate change, calling politicians for action to prevent global warming, ie to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Many people were praising the responsible activities of children and young people to save the Globe. For me and many others the protests of schoolboys and girls were just an indication of how brainwashed and naive children and young people are.
Willingness to believe good about everything is a good thing when it is based on truth, mutual trust, sincerity and respect. Jesus said that we should become like children in order to enter into the kingdom of God. This means practically that we should be sincere in our faith and in our actions. However, Jesus did not encourage people to be naive, because trust in people who are not trustworthy, but use us to accomplish their own goals, does not bring us anything good. When Jesus sent his disciples to spread the message of love and heal the sick, he said: “Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.” (Matthew 10:16)
By saying this, Jesus practically urged people to separate the wheat from the chaff, ie to study the backgrounds and truthfulness of things. Nowadays, people in the spirit of time deny the truth and facts and believe in anything that benefits themselves the most. Some even claim that there is no absolute truth and that the only truth that matters is your own beliefs and choices. This is a totally unrealistic perception. There is one absolute, universal truth that applies to all people: everyone is born into this world as a free individual. Everything else can be traced back to this truth.
Freedom also applies to people born in societies, where freedom is suppressed. Social orders and man-made laws are temporary and collapse the sooner, the farther away from the truth they are, that means the desire to preserve citizens’ freedoms and maintain their well-being. The safest way to maintain your freedom and safeguard your well-being is to take care of the well-being of others and ensure that everyone has the freedom and resources to become the best version of themselves. This is based on common sense.
White Race and Western Lifestyle under Attack
In the last few decades, the lifestyle of Christian Westerners, and in particular the freedom cherished by democracies, are increasingly under attack. The clearest example of this is the restriction of freedom of expression, hate speech laws, and show trials that try to suppress the speakers of truth. We live in an Orwellian world of universal deceit and telling the truth has become a revolutionary act.
This is ancient divide and conquer -tactics. Power elite, whose purpose is to increase own power, try to get people to fight against each other and kill each other to make own conquest efforts as effective as possible. Therefore communication is very selective. The only thing that is released to the public is what those in power consider to advance their own political goals.
Last week, for example, there were screaming headlines in the mainstream media of an attack on the al-Noor mosque in Christchurch, where 50 Muslims died and 50 were injured. Although the perpetrator’s background is often kept in secret, it was now emphasized that he was an Australian man representing “white supremacy”. The mainstream media does not tell anything about al-Noor mosque’s terrorist connections, and we don’t see headlines about Islamist attacks on Christians and Jews, even though they kill thousands of people.
Climate change is almost in position of a religion, the ultimate purpose of which is to create separation between people. There is no scientific proof that people could prevent climate change. Every planet in our solar system is warming up and nobody knows the cause of warming.
However, we hear as little about this as about other alternative perspectives, because it does not advance the agenda of the power elite. Politics is led by ideologies, which ignore facts and the reality and problems are solved either by inventing double standards or by sweeping them under the carpet. Democracies, which should be cradles of equality, begin to treat people on different grounds. This is a totally unsustainable trend.
The Future of Children and Young People
For children and young persons it is difficult to find the truth, because they lack practical experience and a broader view, which is needed to analyze things. They are very straightforward and easily believe everything that is dictated from above. That’s why it is easy to manipulate them to believe anything. As an adult it is difficult to change own perceptions that one has adopted when young, even though there would be plenty of evidence that those perceptions are not truthful.
However, inexperience and ignorance of children and young people is not only a negative thing. It is also their strength over adults. This is simply because the less we have knowledge and ballast accumulated by the ego, the easier it is for us to get in touch with our internal navigator (intuition), which is the divine side in us, our true self.
Our success depends on how well we are able to balance the ego and the divine side of ourselves. In that equation, knowledge and experience have no meaning. Everything is based on common sense when it comes to our internal navigator, and it works in every individual, young and old, according to the same principles. Children, young people as well as adults, only need truthful information to be able to make the same, common sense conclusions about things.
I have attached in the end of this article links to four films (documentaries), which have most affected my own spiritual growth. Today they are as topical as when they were published ten years ago. They are true reality TV shows that are partly also extremely distressing. However, feelings of anxiety should not be pushed away. They are a clear indication that your inner being is determined to create a different kind of reality. You should rather be worried, if you do not feel anxious when you see shocking things: It tells how far you are alienated from your true self.
The Future of our Homeland
When I was young in the 1970s I was by no means politically active. However, I remember that rationalization of tasks, that means, increasing the efficiency of work flow was the catchword at that time. In today’s irrational world, where international propaganda machine is imposing people most insane operating models, rationalization and common sense would correct crumbling structures. We do not have to wait for climate deeds of politicians, because we can do the greatest climate deed ourselves: that is, we can focus on rationalizing our own actions and healing our own energy.
All people in the world deserve representatives who are focused on developing their homeland and safeguarding the well-being of their citizens. Representatives who listen to the voice of reason and make politics with common sense and big heart.
Videos:Paavo Väyrynen: Seitsemän tähden liike
Paavo Väyrysen kysymys- ja vastaustunti Zeitgeist
The Online Movie 2012 (This is not Emmerich’s 2012)
Secret (first 20 minutes) Foster Gamble: Reality check on the New World Order (Interview by Lilou Mace)
Foster Gamble: What would it take for us to thrive ? Solutions (Interview by Lilou Mace)
Thrive movement: How to Share Difficult Information with Friends Without Losing Friendships Brian O’Leary, astrophysicist and former NASA astronaut tells about the suppression of scientific evidence by the power elite (Interview by Project Camelot)
Tommy Robinson: Panodrama – An Exposé of the Fake News BBC
The positive side of disasters is that in front of challenges people hit their wise heads together and begin to speak common sense when their own lives are in danger. It is a pleasure to notice this for example, when reading Youtube discussions. However, it seems that relying on traditional thought patterns mankind has no chance of overcoming the challenges that they face now. It requires at least the miraculous powers of Jesus.
In November, I saw news about California’s forest fires and followed the media’s ridiculous discussion about forest raking. When I was watching a couple of weeks ago a Youtube video about anomalies of the forest fires I could not believe my eyes: I have never seen a forest fire that leaves trees and forests mostly untouched, but destroys the houses, without leaving any recognizable parts of the structures, such as water sinks and bathtubs made of porcelain. Some say that forest fires have never in history chosen their victims with the same precision. Some people think that the fires in California are a sign of the use of directed-energy weapons (DEW).
While watching the videos about the forest fires, I had the same incredible feeling as in September 2001, as I was watching the collapse of the WTC – towers. The words of Jesus began to circle in my mind: “I tell you, in that night there will be two in one bed. One will be taken and the other left. There will be two women grinding together. One will be taken and the other left.” (Luke 17: 34-35) “Two houses are on the same street: One perishes to the ground, the other stays intact”, the video continued.
In the video I watched next, David Icke explained that we should not blame individual people and organizations for world events and manipulation. Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms (Ephesians 6:12). They are fallen angels of God who do not themselves have creative power. They hate people and God’s creation. They use all means to manipulate the human energy field, trying to make people carry out their own goals. The short-term goal is to deceive people into believing in the physical world, which is a small part of the energy field in which we live and where our perception is limited to the five senses. The ultimate goal is to enslave people so that these parasitic forces of darkness can without limitation feed themselves with human energy.
Next video showed how the hell has broken loose in the world, causing floods, landslides, pests, drought, volcanic eruptions, storms and hurricanes, earthquakes etc. When I was watching these natural disasters happening, I felt as if the world around us is falling apart. In between David Wilcock assured that nothing happens without people having impact on things, because the forces of darkness themselves have no creative power and cannot do anything on their own. Natural disasters are the result of people not living in harmony with the natural energy field.
With these thoughts, I came across a video that introduced the supernatural abilities of world-famous magicians (sorcerers). Unlike ordinary magicians, whose magic is based on different kinds of sleight of hand – tricks, real magicians are very careful that people do not regard their magic as mere sleight of hand. They are very proud of their abilities, which are based on the forces usually regarded as witchcraft. They all have the passion to become the world’s greatest sorcerer. The video had a succint name: “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists. In the name the word magician is in quotation marks, because in normal use the word usually refers to sleight of hand-tricks and their illusions.
The word magician in the video refers to sorcerers specializing in levitation, sword swallowing or pushing sticks and needles through the body or limbs, teleportation and telekinesis, walking along a vertical wall, through a wall or on water, pushing a hand through a window without damaging the window, digging a hamburger out of an advertising sign of a fast food restaurant, turning water into wine or coffee into coins, making cards and other objects appear out of thin air, pouring fish from an empty bucket etc. On the video, the actions of these sorcerers got an absolute condemnation and the author of the video thought that the acts are possible only because the persons have made a pact with the devil.
I personally do not want to condemn anyone. I think the most important thing is, how these miracle workers use their powers. All information, inventions and opportunities in the world can be used for good or bad purpose.
Jesus was also accused of casting out demons by the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons. (Matthew 12:24-27) Jesus replied that if Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself and no kingdom divided against itself will stand. It is strange that miracles are sawn as sign of devil’s influence, even though Jesus said that people will do the same kind of miracles as he did and even greater ones (John 14:12).
In February 2014, I wrote in the article “New Humans: Homo Noeticus” that more and more children are born in the world, who have innate abilities that we do not understand. They have a direct connection with the consciousness of the Universe and a special ability to modify the energy field in which we live.
Unlike Jesus, who did miracles to help people, the sorcerers I saw in the video are very egocentric and use their powers only for entertainment purposes. Their abilities are considered to be awkward and many people think they should not even happen, as they are supposedly sign of demon activity. However, some people think that limits of this world should not limit people’s innate abilities, if people knew and believed in their abilities. Jesus says: “If you have faith like a grain of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: Move from here to there, and it would move and nothing will be impossible for you.” (Matthew 17:20)
At present people’s attitudes hardly give opportunities to use the talents of miracle workers for purposes that benefit mankind. However, David Copperfield, who is undoubtedly the best known magician in modern times, has established a medically recognized therapy project (Project Magic), which he considers his proudest achievement. The project operates globally in hospitals in 30 different countries and is designed to apply sleight of hand-tricks used by magicians in occupational therapy, and thus improve the dexterity and cognitive skills of people with different kind of disabilities.
Videos:Firestorm Apocalypse in California
David Icke – Who Built The Matrix?
“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists