The positive side of disasters is that in front of challenges people hit their wise heads together and begin to speak common sense when their own lives are in danger. It is a pleasure to notice this for example, when reading Youtube discussions. However, it seems that relying on traditional thought patterns mankind has no chance of overcoming the challenges that they face now. It requires at least the miraculous powers of Jesus.
In November, I saw news about California’s forest fires and followed the media’s ridiculous discussion about forest raking. When I was watching a couple of weeks ago a Youtube video about anomalies of the forest fires I could not believe my eyes: I have never seen a forest fire that leaves trees and forests mostly untouched, but destroys the houses, without leaving any recognizable parts of the structures, such as water sinks and bathtubs made of porcelain. Some say that forest fires have never in history chosen their victims with the same precision. Some people think that the fires in California are a sign of the use of directed-energy weapons (DEW).
While watching the videos about the forest fires, I had the same incredible feeling as in September 2001, as I was watching the collapse of the WTC – towers. The words of Jesus began to circle in my mind: “I tell you, in that night there will be two in one bed. One will be taken and the other left. There will be two women grinding together. One will be taken and the other left.” (Luke 17: 34-35) “Two houses are on the same street: One perishes to the ground, the other stays intact”, the video continued.
In the video I watched next, David Icke explained that we should not blame individual people and organizations for world events and manipulation. Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms (Ephesians 6:12). They are fallen angels of God who do not themselves have creative power. They hate people and God’s creation. They use all means to manipulate the human energy field, trying to make people carry out their own goals. The short-term goal is to deceive people into believing in the physical world, which is a small part of the energy field in which we live and where our perception is limited to the five senses. The ultimate goal is to enslave people so that these parasitic forces of darkness can without limitation feed themselves with human energy.
Next video showed how the hell has broken loose in the world, causing floods, landslides, pests, drought, volcanic eruptions, storms and hurricanes, earthquakes etc. When I was watching these natural disasters happening, I felt as if the world around us is falling apart. In between David Wilcock assured that nothing happens without people having impact on things, because the forces of darkness themselves have no creative power and cannot do anything on their own. Natural disasters are the result of people not living in harmony with the natural energy field.
With these thoughts, I came across a video that introduced the supernatural abilities of world-famous magicians (sorcerers). Unlike ordinary magicians, whose magic is based on different kinds of sleight of hand – tricks, real magicians are very careful that people do not regard their magic as mere sleight of hand. They are very proud of their abilities, which are based on the forces usually regarded as witchcraft. They all have the passion to become the world’s greatest sorcerer. The video had a succint name: “Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists. In the name the word magician is in quotation marks, because in normal use the word usually refers to sleight of hand-tricks and their illusions.
The word magician in the video refers to sorcerers specializing in levitation, sword swallowing or pushing sticks and needles through the body or limbs, teleportation and telekinesis, walking along a vertical wall, through a wall or on water, pushing a hand through a window without damaging the window, digging a hamburger out of an advertising sign of a fast food restaurant, turning water into wine or coffee into coins, making cards and other objects appear out of thin air, pouring fish from an empty bucket etc. On the video, the actions of these sorcerers got an absolute condemnation and the author of the video thought that the acts are possible only because the persons have made a pact with the devil.
I personally do not want to condemn anyone. I think the most important thing is, how these miracle workers use their powers. All information, inventions and opportunities in the world can be used for good or bad purpose.
Jesus was also accused of casting out demons by the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons. (Matthew 12:24-27) Jesus replied that if Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself and no kingdom divided against itself will stand. It is strange that miracles are sawn as sign of devil’s influence, even though Jesus said that people will do the same kind of miracles as he did and even greater ones (John 14:12).
In February 2014, I wrote in the article “New Humans: Homo Noeticus” that more and more children are born in the world, who have innate abilities that we do not understand. They have a direct connection with the consciousness of the Universe and a special ability to modify the energy field in which we live.
Unlike Jesus, who did miracles to help people, the sorcerers I saw in the video are very egocentric and use their powers only for entertainment purposes. Their abilities are considered to be awkward and many people think they should not even happen, as they are supposedly sign of demon activity. However, some people think that limits of this world should not limit people’s innate abilities, if people knew and believed in their abilities. Jesus says: “If you have faith like a grain of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain: Move from here to there, and it would move and nothing will be impossible for you.” (Matthew 17:20)
At present people’s attitudes hardly give opportunities to use the talents of miracle workers for purposes that benefit mankind. However, David Copperfield, who is undoubtedly the best known magician in modern times, has established a medically recognized therapy project (Project Magic), which he considers his proudest achievement. The project operates globally in hospitals in 30 different countries and is designed to apply sleight of hand-tricks used by magicians in occupational therapy, and thus improve the dexterity and cognitive skills of people with different kind of disabilities.
Videos:Firestorm Apocalypse in California
David Icke – Who Built The Matrix?
“Magicians” Prove A Spiritual World Exists
The United Nations member states are expected to accept (sign) in Marrakesh, Morocco on the 10-11 December 2018 the United Nations Convention on Immigration and Migration (Global Compact for Migration or Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration). In Morocco the agreement will be voted on and it will be clarified, whether there is a consensus among the member states towards the compact. Acceptance requires (the signature of) at least two-thirds majority. Thereafter, the GCM is formally proceeding to the vote of the UN General Assembly.
There has been very little public debate about the GCM agreement in Finland. Less than a month ago it was raised for discussion when Laura Huhtasaari (Finns Party), a Member of Parliament, urged the government to bring the GCM agreement for a parliamentary plenary session to deal with.
I got the GCM agreement text and its unofficial translation in my hands only about two weeks ago. Internet discussions I found on the subject make me think that people do not see the forest for the trees. Or would I say that people argue about fence posts without seeing the fence. It shows that they can not discriminate and differentiate things. And that’s what the GCM agreement seeks for. The term “discrimination” has only a negative meaning in the compact. Discrimination, however, has a positive meaning as well, which relates to clear perception and definition of things.
In my view, the biggest contradiction in the GCM agreement is that many (if not most) of the authors of the agreement come from countries, whose human rights situation is catastrophic, such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Nigeria, South Africa, Afghanistan, etc. However, the agreement emphasizes that it rests on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which the Western World is committed to, even though according to Wikipedia the UDHR is not a legally binding document. It is said that the GCM Agreement is not binding, but the western countries are under obligation to comply with it, since the compact has the word “commit” in its various forms over 80 times. Taqiya, Lucifer’s voice can be heard throughout the agreement text.
I wrote in September 2015 in the article “We do not have human rights” that God did not give us human rights as a birthright. If human rights would be our inherent property, no one could take them away from us. In my view, the only human right we have is to become friends with our true self, our inner navigator. Only by listening to the voice of our heart or the voice of reason, that is common sense, we obey God.
Religious doctrines have nothing to do with God’s law, that is, the laws of nature that are the basis of our lives. However, the Declaration of Human Rights emphasizes everyone’s right to believe in anything and to act according to one’s faith. So if someone believes that he will serve his God by eliminating all infidels or gentiles, according to the UDHR he has the right to act according to his belief.
It should be noted that any political ideology or agenda and a historical, scientific, economic or social perception may become in human mind a kind of religious doctrine with holy alliance, which sole aim is to preserve and strengthen its own dominance. This has become more and more clear in recent decades when the so-called pluralistic democracies can handle only one official truth and ignore facts when observing and studying the universe.
Dissidents are silenced in one way or another: alternative views do not get media coverage, research grants or other funding. They are disqualified either in public debate or in all silence. Representatives of “false” views will be defamed by whatever means, and in the worst case, their lives and their career will be destroyed.
Wikipedia states (in Finnish) that “the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was drafted as a result of the Second World War, which required tens of millions of lives. The purpose of it was to create a supranational mechanism to avoid the recurrence of a massacre like the Jewish Holocaust, and to end the persecution of sexual minorities.”
When we think realistically about these noble goals and whether the Declaration of Human Rights has been able to end persecution, the conclusion is negative. Not even the first article of the Declaration of Human Rights on freedom and equality has come true within democratic societies, which essentially respect the rule of law and the reciprocity principle.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Article 1
Some people are more free and more equal than others. In my opinion, this is due to the natural fact that people’s starting points, civic skills and resources are very different. Equal rights does not mean similar rights.
The lack of equality is also due to the lack of reciprocity: some people simply do not have empathy or even do not want to imagine the position of others. They do not listen to the voice of reason and conscience is a foreign word to them. They think that the Declaration of Human Rights should be applied only to their own rights without any obligation to other than at most to their own reference group.
This was a topic of criticism when drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Many thought that the Declaration of Human Rights underlined too much the rights of an individual and ignored the fact that the rights have corresponding responsibilities that ensure the realization of the human rights of other members of society. However, it was considered that the last articles 29 and 30 of the Declaration of Human Rights were sufficient to emphasize these responsibilities:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Article 29 and 30
Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.
Despite the emphasis on responsibility it has become increasingly clear that the Declaration of Human Rights is used to defend the rights of criminals at the expense of victims. Entrepreneur, who defends his / her property (and his / her existence) is liable to pay indemnity for dissemination of information that violates privacy of thieves after publishing images of them. When robbers get caught red-handed and have to face the pointer of the owner’s gun, they can get compensation for their mental trauma and suffering. Some people are convicted for expressing and publishing their opinions, that means for executing their civic duty. An immigrant seeks mitigation for his rape sentence on the grounds that his country of origin is in bad condition and he has thought that sex is free in Europe (and people are easy prey).
The mainstream media, schools etc. have been for decades pronouncing the Holocaust of Jews, even though objective history research tells quite another story. The rights of sexual minorities are emphasized in every turn, and the easiest way to get to the public today is to declare yourself homosexual, lesbian, or transgender or to share some of your own perverted fetish.
Last week I heard about a case when a severely disabled person went to a doctor to apply for a certificate for rehabilitation. When the doctor did not believe (or understand) him, a physiotherapist was needed. The doctor was an immigrant from an Islamic country, who simply did not understand, why disabled people need rehabilitation.
In my ears this sounded as if the doctor did not understand, why people, who need rehabilitation need rehabilitation. I do not argue that all people coming from Islamic countries would not understand it. Nor do I say that in Finland or in the Western World all people would understand and accept it, unless they themselves need rehabilitation. In recent years the basic services of citizens have been arbitrarily cut.
The Western social order, and especially the principle of legality, is in real danger, if countries employ such people in decision-making positions, who do not understand or accept the basic principles of organized civil society. They are easily manipulated by people, who interpret the Declaration of Human Rights on the basis of their own interests to consolidate their own power, without thinking about the functioning of society as a whole.
The civic skills and other characteristics that democratic, organized societies demand from their members are quite different from those in developing countries. Maintaining these skills and, in particular, fostering reciprocity, requires special skills and enthusiasm from decision-makers. The duty of every citizen, especially decision-makers, is to act in accordance with Articles 29 and 30 of the Declaration of Human Rights, so that balanced development of society and the realization of citizens’ fundamental rights are possible.
The purpose of the GCM is to promote migration in all its forms, regardless of the reason why migrants have left their country. The agreement does not take into account that all organized and developed, democratic societies have undergone critical, warring phases. If the people in these countries would have en masse escaped from war and miserable conditions, they would not have been able to generate prosperity. For example, young men fleeing the war in Finland were deserters, who were punished for not defending their country.
This is where citizens’ duty to society is highlighted, as mentioned in Article 29 of the Declaration of Human Rights. Citizens’ responsibility to society does not apply to states only at international level, but also at national level society must ensure that citizens’ fundamental rights are realized throughout the country. Citizens must defend their living environment and ensure the sustainable development of society at all levels.
In my view, the United Nations should not promote mass migration as human right. Despite the great technological and economic development, mentally and spiritually people are still underdeveloped. They are not so moral and accountable that they would take each other’s needs into consideration. Democracies turn into kleptocracies and people are going over where the fence is lowest, which leads to decay of organized welfare societies. In such an environment it is hopeless to expect the realization of human rights.
The 30. article in the Declaration of Human Rights specifically emphasizes that it is not allowed to interpret any segment of the declaration in a way that a state, group or person could engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms defined in the declaration.
Migration is at its best a good thing. It gives people the opportunity to expand their world view, face new challenges and grow mentally. All this benefits at its best both the country of origin and the host country. However, the rules of the game must be clear and fair to all parties, so that migration would be constructive.
In my opinion, the most important obligation relating to human rights is respect for the truth. Everyone has the right to receive and share truthful information. A person, who distorts or spreads modified truth is directly violating rights of others. Just as human rights are personal, respect of truth should also be a personal obligation in all communication. Fact-checking should be every person’s responsibility, because we are all informants.
No one should have the right to outsource thinking. Effective action according to common sense requires respect for the facts. Because as Voltaire said: The only barrier to truth is the belief that you already know it.
Videos:Stefan Molyneux: The Terrible Truth About the UN Migration Compact
InfoWars: Understanding UN Population Migration Agenda
David Duke: Multiculturalism in Europe – Who is Behind It? Mark Collett: Writing Europeans Out of Their Own History
The Britisher: Do White People have no Culture? David Wilcock: Occupy Your Self! Personal Spiritual Development
When Donald Trump visited Europe in July, he said that the EU is the biggest rival, foe of the USA. When I saw the word ‘foe’ for the first time it had the meaning of ‘fool’ (a useful idiot) in my mind. So the EU is the most significant useful idiot of the USA. “That’s right,” I thought.
The EU is part of the world’s largest continent, Eurasia, with direct access to Russia, Asia, the Arabian Peninsula and Africa. The USA has done its utmost to drive a wedge between the countries in Eurasia, because if everyone would find a common voice and start cooperating with each other, the US hegemony would end completely.
At present, the EU acts in an inexplicable naïve way in relationship with Russia when it uncritically carries out the demands of the US (and its Jewish lobbyists) for sanctions on Russia. Trump and his partners are first and foremost businessmen. As the EU implements economic sanctions on Russia, the US has free hands to trade with this country that has “violated international rules”. At the same time, EU countries lose hundreds of billions of euros.
I wrote in January 2013 in the article Everything is Perfect about the change in the world’s socio-economic power relations after I saw a lecture of the former World Bank President James Wolfensohn about the topic. He suggests that by 2050, economic power will shift from developed countries to developing countries. 1/6 of the world’s population, which now holds 80% of world’s wealth, will have to settle for 35% in the future.
James Wolfensohn’s visions only concern China, India, Africa, Brazil and other developing countries. He does not speak at all about Russia, although he is mentioning Russia at one point. Perhaps this is due to schizophrenic relationships of the US with Russia. However, I believe that Russia will be an even greater economic power than China in the future. Simply because Russia’s land area is almost double that of China, it has a lot of natural resources and the land is very fertile.
When looking at Eurasia from the east coast of China, old Europe is its remote corner. Construction work in Eurasia (including Russia) has been non-existent and its enormous potential has not been utilized. But I believe this is about to change. The French President Emmanuel Macron said during his visit to Finland that Russia should also become involved in European defense co-operation. In my opinion all Eurasian countries should work together to ensure peaceful coexistence and to avoid violence on the continent. Everyone should be able to build peacefully their society according to citizens’ wishes.
The Finnish president Sauli Niinistö thinks that defense co-operation with Russia is not possible until there is some progress in the situation in Ukraine. Would it not be easier to correct own attitudes and believe Vladimir Putin’s words when he assures that Russia is not behind the Ukrainian war? In my article Quite Another Matter I wrote in September 2014 that I do not think Russia is responsible for the violent coup in Ukraine.
Russia’s interest was certainly not to overthrow the president of Ukraine, who treasured the relations with Russia. Following the coup, Vladimir Putin reacted to the events and tried to save what was possible to save. Everyone would have done the same.
At the same time as the EU tries to convince its member states of the necessity of Russia’s sanctions, the Russian Eastern Economic Forum convenes in Vladivostok between 11-13 September, and the EU has officially no representation there, unlike the United States. The US is developing in silence its economic ties with Russia when its biggest rival has deliberately been lagged behind.
We are being convinced of the importance of EU membership e.g. by emphasizing that we need to be involved in decision-making about ourselves. Opponents of the EU are stigmatized as narrow-minded country pumpkins, who lack the understanding of things in a broader perspective. In my view, the decision-makers of the European Union are acting unbelievably short-sighted and blinkered with regard to Russia. For the future of Europe as a whole, they should at least understand their position and responsibility.
It is not only a question of the European Union, but at its best, the EU can promote development throughout the Eurasian continent. The EU can either play its part as a co-operation body of the nation-states and raise citizens’ well-being to new levels or close its ears on facts, act as a useful idiot, and decline into an Eurasian periphery.
Ville Kyrönlahti (vastavalkea.fi): Venäjän idänsuuntaus: katsaus taustoihin ja tilaan ennen Ukrainan kriisiä
Ville Kyrönlahti (vastavalkea.fi): Onko Venäjä haastamassa Yhdysvaltain aseman Koillis-Aasiassa?
Videos:Vladimir Putin on Ukraine
Vladimir Putin on US hegemony Putin Decides to Finally Fix the East: Demands Ministers Begin Implementing Economic Projects
What sanctions? Best Moments From Putin, Abe, Macron and Lagarde Meeting At St.Petersburg International Economic Forum-2018 James Wolfensohn (Former World Bank President): Big Shift Coming
At the beginning of May, the Finnish Parliament rejected a citizens’ initiative to legalize euthanasia. It was as if the decision makers wanted to apologize for the negative decision when they explained that the purpose is to focus on developing better ways for palliative care. It is strange that we consider palliative care – that is, termination of treatment at a certain stage of disease – as normal. In some countries, where human rights are less emphasised, like in China, termination of treatment is prohibited by law.
I have not delved deeper into Chinese law, and I do not know what is behind the prohibition. However, using common sense my logic says that in China, where the interests of society are above interests of an individual, diseases and patients have an important role to play in the society. Medicine can evolve and develop better treatments only by treating diseases. If every seriously ill person would like to terminate own treatment or to have mercy killing, the development of medicine would stop altogether.
People can argue, whether the interests of society should be above those of individual’s. The fact is, however, that an individual has value only in relation to the society and to the community where he/she lives. I personally had to deal with this issue 40 years ago when I had a stroke, which left behind a serious communication and physical disability. Thinking of myself as an individual it did not matter, if I continued my life, or if I committed suicide when my life seemed to have no foundation any more.
When I was thinking of myself as a member of the community, everything seemed quite different: I was unique, because no one had exactly the same experiences that I had and not exactly the same associations and connotations for things. My thinking patterns were different. This idea made me appreciate myself as an individual. I thought that no matter how negative my experience was, I wanted it to serve me as constructive building material.
In my opinion, there is not so much need to develop palliative care in our country. It would be wonderful, if policy makers get even basic and special health care up to date. They should focus on that, because there is still very much to do to ensure effective health care. The best palliative treatment would be that it would be unnecessary when people would be healthy and able to live despite of their diseases and limitations.
Over 10 years ago I saw in Youtube some videos about people using cannabis to treat cancer. I even watched a tutorial, how to make cannabis oil (THC). Some people had been given permission to use cannabis as medicine and they smoked it as pain reliever.
Josh Stanley, who in 2010 was involved in drafting rules and regulations for legalizing medicinal cannabis use in Colorado State, said in his TED speech in 2013 that legalizing cannabis had side effects, such as a terrible back pain epidemic on college campuses.
For this reason, he decided with his brothers to breed a special strain of cannabis plant with no psychoactive THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) compound and with high proportion of cannabis plant’s healing, non-psychoactive compound CBD (cannabidiol). The Stanley brothers succeeded in this breeding project in January 2012. In February 2012, they decided to use the plant to treat Charlotte Figi.
Charlotte had been diagnosed with a rare and violent form of epilepsy (Dravet syndrom) when she was three months old. When Stanley brothers learned to know her, she was five years old. Epileptic seizures were at their worst, about 400 seizures a week and for that reason, Charlotte was virtually most of the time in catatonic state, was non-functional so to speak. Doctors were unable to improve the situation and parents were told to make preparations for the death of their child.
At this time, the Figi family contacted the Stanley brothers, who had just succeeded in breeding a cannabis strain without the psycho-active compound. When the brothers started Charlotte’s cannabis treatment they could see the plant’s astonishing effect. Within the first administration Charlotte’s epileptic seizures went from 400 per week to 0-1 per week and she became a viable girl.
The Stanley brothers had originally given their cannabis strain the name ‘Hippie’s Disappointment’, but after seeing its effect in Charlotte’s case, they gave it the name ‘Charlotte’s Web’. However, Charlotte is not an isolated incident, in which the plant has manifested its astonishing effects. In some cases, the effects are even better.
Inspired by the results, the Stanley brothers established a non-profit organization, the Realm of Caring, that helps to provide support, resources, education, physician-backed medical studies, as well as safe and affordable access to their treatment program.
The medical effect of cannabis has been studied very little because of the demonization of the plant. However, it is known that CBD interacts on the human innate Endo-Cannabinoid System (ECS). It supports the body’s information system and natural energy flow, and tries to restore the body’s physiological balance (homeostasis).
Our body naturally produces two cannabinoids, e.g. during meditation (bliss molecule) and our cell surfaces have receptors for CBD. This means that our body is equipped to use CBD, it is literally a natural medicine.
I wrote four years ago in my article Emotional Intelligence in Function about my experience in 1982, when I made total relaxation exercises. I did the exercises lying on the floor and practically I was in a meditative state all the time. The left side of my body is paralyzed, and at that time the right and left sides of my body felt clearly different. When I was lying on my bed one night after a week of relaxation exercises (meditation), the feeling on both sides of my body was similar.
I turned to my back and lifted my left leg, which I usually was able to lift just a few centimetres from its ground. I was amazed to see it rise lightly to a 90 degree angle. Despite the stroke and my confusion, my body’s Endo-Cannabinoid system seemed to work well.
To be continued…
Videos::The Inside Story of Cannabidiol – What are the Benefits of CBD?
Dr Michelle Bean (Silicon Valley Health Institute): Health Benefits of CBD Oil
Cannabis Is In Your DNA
Dr. William Courtney: Raw Cannabis Advantages Josh Stanley: The surprising story of medical marijuana and pediatric epilepsy
Charlotte’s Web and Zaki’s Journey
Megan Elizabeth: What Happened To My Body | 60 Days of CBD Oil Cannabis Changed This Autistic Toddler’s Life Forever Man With Parkinson’s Tried CBD For The First Time Sharon Kelly: Cannabis Killed My Terminal Stage IV Lung Cancer Reverse Stroke | Amazing New Stroke Cure
For a long time, nothing so positive has happened in the political arena than the meeting of President Trump and Putin. It made me feel good. The presidents found a dialogical connection, what was the purpose of the meeting and at the press conference they spoke common sense, and did not unnecessarily provoke each other.
In this mindset, it has been appalling to follow the US media’s attitude towards Trump and Putin’s negotiations. It seems that the leading news agencies and top journalists in the United States have lost their minds. News headlines are screaming: “Helsinki meeting was a “serious mistake”, Trump’s cowardice before Putin, Trump betrayed his country, the security of the US threatened, Helsinki summit may be a time when a more unstable world order was created, time to prepare for the worst case scenario etc.”
These news headlines tell that it is time for Americans to look seriously in the mirror. Journalists seemed to rebuke Donald Trump’s every word. When Trump admitted that both have made mistakes, someone thought he should have confronted Putin of the mistakes of Russia. I have thought that each of us should correct our own faults, as we can most effectively influence only ourselves, when we have the will to improve ourselves.
Donald Trump said at the beginning of the press conference that US-Russian relations have never been as bad as now. In his view, a US – Russian meeting should have been held long before he took office. At the beginning of the negotiations Trump was not in a position, in which he could have set any conditions. Based on his previous experiences, Putin did not expect anything from the meeting. Maybe he was optimistic, but the meeting could have been same kind of harping as before, which does not bring things forward at all.
This time, however, Putin was pleased with the results of the negotiations. Donald Trump was able to listen and he was sensitive enough to create a conversation and they were able to negotiate deeply and honestly about many things. Although nothing concrete was agreed upon, the most important thing was to begin a dialogue, which would enable concrete measures in the future.
For the US, it seems to be a national trauma that in 2016 the Democrats lost the presidential election. Russia has been blamed for that, but I believe that Trump won the election because he represents things that have support among the people. Citizens are capable of independent thinking, and no propaganda or information can affect them, unless it resonates with common sense and their sense of justice.
Trump won the election, because the people have had enough of the power structures that benefit a few and are decaying Western democracy. More than 10 years have passed since the publication of the Zeitgeist-documentary, which was the first presentation to comprehensively address the prevailing power structures. Although there has been harsh censorship, people have had a better chance than ever to get acquainted with the actions of the rulers. It is said that the Soviet Union broke up, because the power structures became more transparent to the people. People returned power to themselves, as it should be.
Allegations against Russia are nothing compared with the fact that the USA has not only meddled in countless elections worldwide, but has actively participated in bloody military coups. It is almost inconceivable to think of the destruction that the US with its allies caused when they defeated the national socialist Germany in the 1940s.
How could it be possible that the US intelligence services, which emphasize their reliability and accuracy and who think that people, who mistrust them are traitors, did not know the situation in Germany prior to the war and informed about it, for example, General Patton, the commander of the U.S. Third Army, who was responsible for American operations in Germany?
It is almost impossible to imagine the pain and the feeling of being betrayed, what General Patton has experienced when Germany was in ruins and he found out that the allies had fought against the wrong people. He had acted as a useful idiot in the state machine, and when he realized it, he suffered the fate of a useful idiot: he was eliminated in all silence.
From an ordinary citizen’s point of view, common sense says to me that either the intelligence services are not at all up to date or are deliberately misleading and deceiving people and in that way act in contravention of the interests of Americans. When I follow world events, it seems that the US is in the pocket of evil spirits, which have as little aspiration to promote the interests of the USA as the interests of any other gentile nation.
At this time Russia is the eyesore of these warmongers. It should be noted that today’s Russia is a completely different country than the Soviet Union established by the Bolsheviks. It was not even allowed to bring Bibles to the Soviet Union that adhered to the legacy of Jewish Bolsheviks. Putin has strengthened the position of Orthodox Christianity as national religion of Russia and has built churches that were destroyed in Soviet times.
When the Soviet Union broke up in the early 1990s, the descendants of the Bolshevik government left the country like rats leave a sinking ship. The oligarchs who tried to rob as much as possible of state’s property found themselves in jail. This despite the fact that they had brought Putin to power. In 2015 George Soros’s Open Society that instigates anarchy and social conflicts, was banned in Russia.
For this reason, the media trumpets Trump’s incompetence, disgrace, treason and cowardice. It is a reflection of the panic of the financial elite (oligarchs). As Trump begins to be serious about cooperating with Putin, as we hope, oligarchs and society-destroying powers in the USA may also end up behind bars.
On October 10, 1920, the American Hebrew Magazine wrote that the revolution of the Bolsheviks in Russia was executed by the Jews. Jewish plan was to create a New World Order, that is to say, the Jewish world order. What worked so well in Russia should become reality for the whole world they thought. Until now Vladimir Putin has been a concrete obstacle to the realization of these plans. That is why Russia has been in the teeth of the NWO leaders. Nothing would be more desirable for these warmongers than to bring about a new Bolshevik revolution in Russia.
But the unipolar world order and the monetary system that is enslaving people have come to an end. Donald Trump’s statement gives some indication to this. He says: “I would rather take a political risk in the persuade of peace than to risk peace for political reasons.” (Spoken: I would rather risk my career than world peace for political reasons.) It remains to be seen, if Trump and Putin are sincere in their intentions.
Be that as it may, the change starts always among ordinary people. No politician can promote things without the support of the people. We have to wake up and maintain the awareness, so that we can support those, who promote our well-being.
Videos:David Icke: Why was Donald Trump Elected? Fox News: Chris Wallace interviews Russian President Vladimir Putin TruNews: Vladimir Putin Says “Powerful Forces” At Work in America Brother Nathanael: The Religion Of Vladimir Putin
Brother Nathanael: Controversy Of The Russian Czar Today Blackstone Intelligence Network: Trump Putin Meeting Causes Media Meltdown
Blackstone Intelligence Network: What Does the Phrase “New World Order” Actually Mean?
Blackstone Intelligence Network: The Truth About Israel’s Role in the New World Order
Blackstone Intelligence Network: The Rothschild Syria Connection
Blackstone Intelligence Network: The US Government Is Assassinating American Citizens